Abstract
While institutional changes in the religious landscape of Norwegian society have received much scholarly interest in recent decades, less attention has been paid to the agency provided by actors within the Church of Norway. Among the many ecclesial actors, the role of Director General of the National Council of the Church of Norway has emerged as one of the more important in the process of disestablishing the Church of Norway as a state church. In asking how the Directors General of the Church of Norway performed their institutional work during the disestablishment of the Church of Norway, the article reveals the manner in which three sequential Directors General provided institutional leadership while navigating the church through its institutional change. Using theoretical perspectives on institutional work and leadership, the article analyzes the work undertaken by these three Directors General in relation to state–church matters between 1998 and 2021. By considering previous studies showing how institutional leadership engages in securing internal cohesion and external support while overcoming external opposition, the article shows how each of these elements played a pivotal role in directing the agency of the Directors General at a specific point in the process.
References
Aarflot, A. (2015). Motifs and perspectives in the reform process of the Church of Norway. In H. Askeland & U. Schmidt (Eds.), Church reform and leadership of change (pp. 18–37). Pickwick Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p5f1zq.7
Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268353
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology: New visitas for qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772610
Askeland, H., & Schmidt, U. (2015). Church reform and leadership of change (Vol. 12). Pickwick Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p5f1zq
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 104(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Eriksson, A.-L., Gunner, G., & Blåder, N. (2012). Exploring a heritage: Evangelical Lutheran Churches in the north. Pickwick Publications.
Furseth, I. (2018). Religious complexity in the public sphere. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9
Hampel, C. E., Lawrence, T. B., & Tracey, P. (2017). Institutional work: Taking stock and making it matter. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 558–590). SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n22
Innst. 193 L (2019–2020). Innstilling til Stortinget fra familie- og kulturkomiteen. Prop. 130 L (2018–2019).
Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2009). Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 284–316). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.011
Kirkerådet, D. n. k. (2004). Den norske kirkes identitet og oppdrag. Uttalelse fra Kirkemøtet 2004. https://kirken.no/globalassets/kirken.no/om-kirken/slik-styres-kirken/planer-visjonsdokument-og-strategier/identitet_oppdrag_2004_bokmaal.pdf
Kraatz, M. S. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59–91). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.003
Lawrence, T. B., Leca, B., & Zilber, T. B. (2013). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1023–1033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613495305
Lawrence, T. B., & Phillips, N. (2019). Constructing organizational life. How social-symbolic work shapes selves, organizations, and institutions. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840022.001.0001
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.n7
Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596605.001
Nicholls, E. J. (2022). The witness seminar: A research note. Qualitative Research, 22(1), 166–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974153
NOU 2006: 2. (2006). Staten og Den norske kirke https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/62409504b06e47c68098feaadee668d1/no/pdfs/nou200620060002000dddpdfs.pdf
Nylenna, H. (2021). Stat(s)kirke - Aktørseminar om prosessen fram mot, og i etterkant av, endringer i relasjonen mellom stat og kirke [State Church - Witness seminar on the process before and after changing relations between the state and The Church of Norway] (2021/2). (VID rapport, Issue. V. S. University. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2834754
Nylenna, H., & Sirris, S. (2023). A legitimate church democracy? Legitimacy work and democratic reform during the separation of Church and State in Norway. Journal of Church and State, 65(2), 197–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csac096
Reay, T., Zilber, T. B., Langley, A., & Tsoukas, H. (2019). Introduction: Institutions and organizations. In T. Reay, T. B. Zilber, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Institutions and organizations: A process view (pp. 1–11). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843818.003.0001
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Schmidt, U. (2011). State, law and religion in Norway. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 24(2), 137–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1890-7008-2011-02-03
Schmidt, U. (2015). Church reforms and public reforms. In H. Askeland & U. Schmidt (Eds.), Church reform and leadership of change (pp. 38–55). Pickwick Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p5f1zq.8
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Silverman, D. (2017). Doing qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications, Ltd.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2009). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 176–195). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Tansey, E. M. (2006). Witnessing the witnesses: Potentials and pitfalls of the witness seminar in the history of twentieth-century medicine. In R. E. Doel & T. Söderqvist (Eds.), The Historiography of contemporary science, technology, and medicine. Writing recent science. (pp. 260–279). Routledge.
Washington, M., Boal, K. B., & Davis, J. N. (2008). Institutional leadership: Past, present, and future. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 721–735). SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n31
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Helge Nylenna